Near Failure at Nagasaki case - 1034 Words

Facts Mission planned for Aug. 11th. Moved to Aug. 9th due to weather conditions. Maj. Charles W. Sweeney was the pilot in command. Flew the leading aircraft, Bockscar, which would drop the bomb. Navy Cmdr. Frederick L. Ashworth: senior weaponeer on board Bockscar. Had managed field-testing of the atomic bomb. Primary target: Kokuro. Secondary target: Nagasaki. Six B-29s were assigned for the mission. Capt. Fredrick C. Bock flew the instrumental aircraft, The Great Artiste. Lt. Col. James I. Hopkins Jr. flew the observation/photo airplane, Big Stink. Two weather airplanes: Enola Gay (flown by Capt. George Marquardt) and Laggin’ Dragon (flown by Capt. Charles F. McKnight). Enola Gay monitored Kokuro and Laggin’ Dragon†¦show more content†¦However, because of a firebomb strike from two nights before, the target was not clear. Regardless of the angle that Sweeney had tried to approach the target, the smoke was making it difficult to visually see where to release the bomb. They were not prepared for this outcome. Instead of ending the mission there, Sweeney had decided to go to Nagasaki. However, they were not prepared for the trip to Nagasaki. They should have ended the mission there, especially since they were low on fuel. Issue: Lack of motivation Motivating a crew is very important in succeeding as a team. Everyone needs to be acknowledged and understand what they can bring to the team. Solution Positive Negative Sweeney should address the importance of everyone’s role in the mission. This would cause everyone to feel important and fulfill their position. Knowing Sweeney doesn’t have combat experience, they may not trust him. Sweeney to approach Hopkins and create a relationship. Would destroy any tension between the two, making Hopkins perform his best. Hopkins may feel offended and continue having a non-cooperative attitude towards Sweeney, because he was his JR. Tibbets should acknowledge Sweeney’s skills; explain why Sweeney was chosen. Sweeney would be more secure about why he was chosen and make better decisions. Sweeney would be seen as weak because he relies on someone else to lead and/or motivate him. Solution From the beginning, Hopkins did not respectShow MoreRelatedNear Failure at Nagasaki1280 Words   |  6 Pagesï » ¿ Near Failure at Nagasaki MGT 3300 Case study 1 Prof. James Walsh 09/29/2014 facts Mission was planned for August 11th but was changed to the 9th due to bad weather Primary target was Kokura and Nagasaki was secondary Bomb to be dropped was called Fat Man, a plutonium bomb more complex than the one dropped on Hiroshima 509th commander, Col. Paul W. Tibbets Jr. choose Maj. Charles W. Sweeney, commander of the 393rd Bomb Squadron to command the mission Six B-29s wasRead MoreThe Nuclear Bomb Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Essay1393 Words   |  6 PagesThe nuclear bombs code named â€Å"Little Boy† and â€Å"Fat Man† were detonated over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the summer of August 1945 by the United States of America in an attempt to end World War II. The immediate death toll was extremely high with an estimated 60,000 to 80,000 people killed upon impact of the bombs due to the extreme heat, flying shrapnel, and the pressure of the blast wave. The overall death toll is now estimated to be about 192,020 dead due to long term healthRead MoreEssay on Manhattan Project1664 Words   |  7 PagesAtomic bomb was done in the United States, by a group of the best scientists; this research was given the name of amp;quot;The Manhattan Projectamp;quot;. On Monday July 16th, 1945, a countdown for the detonation of the first atomic bomb took place near Los Alamos, New Mexico. This atomic bomb testing would forever change the meaning of war. As the atomic bomb was detonated it sent shock-waves all over the world. There was endless research done on the bomb in the United States. The research was calledRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb Of The United States Essay1748 Words   |  7 PagesOn Monday July 16th, 1945, a countdown for the detonation of the first atomic bomb took place near Los Alamos, New Mexico. This atomic bomb testing would forever change the meaning of war. As the atomic bomb was detonated it sent shock-waves all over the world. There was endless research done on the bomb in the United States. The research was called The Manhattan Engineer District Project but it was more commonly known as The Manhattan Project. The Manhattan Project was brought by fear of GermanyRead MoreMan Made Disasters1673 Words   |  7 PagesMan-made disasters Man-made disasters are disasters resulting from man-made hazards (threats having an element of human intent, negligence, or error; or involving a failure of a man-made system), as opposed to natural disasters resulting from natural hazards. Man-made hazards or disasters are sometimes referred to as anthropogenic. Contents * 1 Sociological hazards * 1.1 Crime * 1.1.1 Arson * 1.2 Civil disorder * Read MoreRadiation And Nuclear Radiation Therapy1992 Words   |  8 Pageshabitation. However, her new home still received 40% of the fallout from the reactor. All of her family was touched by cancer and people around her became ill. When Katrine turned 20, she became ill with chronic fatigue, fibro myalgia, and kidney failure. She lost some of her teeth, she began having problems with her bones, she became severely depressed, and she had extreme anemia. Katrine has seen firsthand the effects of radiation on the human body to those around her and to herself. Katrine realizedRead MoreWorld War II : A Power Struggle Within Europe Essay2540 Words   |  11 Pagesthe Allies for the war effort. Soon the United States was encouraged to prepare for the event of World War II, and decided to increase and improve its military forces, began to accord aid to the other Allied countries, and created defense plants in case a possible Axis threat found its way to the United Stat es. At the time, there were thousands of men commissioned into all different branches of the United States military forces. In 1945, the numbers heavily increased and changed into millions of menRead MoreRacism, Revenge, the War without Mercy, and the Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb2012 Words   |  8 PagesWorld War II as the good war that destroyed fascism in Europe and Asia, and do not like to imagine that racism, brutality, and cynical calculations of postwar power politics were also present on their side, but the record shows this was indeed the case with the decision to use the atomic bombs on Japan (Sherwin xvi). Therefore, the official version put forward in 1947 by Henry Stimson that the atomic bombs were used to save American lives, was incomplete at best, for other factors such as racismRead MoreNuclear Technology And Its Impact On The Atomic Age1790 Words   |  8 PagesOn August 6th and 9th, 1945 the first atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki Japan. Wit h the use of these new weapons a door was opened that could never be closed, a new and uncertain era was now upon the world, and the use of atomic power could mean the betterment or destruction of a nation at a moment’s notice. Whether you like it or not, you live in the atomic age and it can have many implications that you may or may not know about. The Manhattan Project is well known to have developedRead More Nuclear Power and Testing Essay examples2337 Words   |  10 PagesSoviet Union, scientists continued to study and develop the Atomic Bomb. Nevertheless, at the end of World War II, a moral debate ensued between scientists and politicians. Many physicists felt that the atomic bomb secrets should be shared after Nagasaki and Hiroshima, however, politicians felt it necessary to continue in secrecy because of the fear of communism and the hysteria of McCarthyism rampant in the United States. Due to the moral dilemma and debate over the secrecy of the program many scientists

Corporation and Corporate Social Responsibility - MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about the Corporation and Corporate Social Responsibility. Answer: Introduction: According to the case study the issue has been arises when the directors of the Chocolate Cleaning Products Pty Ltd (CCP) Alana and David has decided to fire Max who is the company solicitor and also owned 5% of shareholders of the Company. Now Max wants to enforce the clause in the constitution making or as a company solicitor. When Max has been engaged in the Chocolate Cleaning Products Pty Ltd (CCP) Company he has included a clause in the constitution of the company where he mentioned about himself as the company solicited and which is not replaceable accept for negligence act by him[1]. Now CCP has already a Sol who is an investor and mentor and experience in the cleaning products industry. Here they think it is enough of having Sols advice in regards to proposed expansion activities and there is no need of Max for other activities in the company where they also insert new clauses which mentioned the right to expropriate the shareholding of members owning less than 10% of the total shares issued[2]. The 136 of Corporation act provides the legislation where a company can form the constitution which has been effective for the relatable company and every members of it. Under the section 9 of the Corporation Act has provided the special resolution where the company members specially the shareholders provide their words and with at least 75% of votes by the shareholders has passed in favor of the resolution[3]. It is also important to mention that when Max has engaged with the company he has included a clause in the constitution appointing himself as a company solicitor and not replaced except for negligence [4]therefore the directors has the knowledge about the clause and as Max not engaged with any activities of negligence therefore they cannot replace him. However in the General Meeting the directors of the company has passed a special resolution which has been used as a altar for the companys constitution and also inserted new clause where board has legislate their rights to Expo create the shareholdings of members who owns less than 10% of the total shares issued[5]. Therefore when Max has included the clauses about the replaceable of his position and the directors also have the knowledge about such clause. Now they have breach their duties as a director of the corporation[6]. The section 181 provided such clause where directors are bound to do work for the cooperation with care and diligence, good faith and must not misuse their position. Therefore the section 181,182, 183 and 184 has been breached by the directors of the company. Therefore Max can take legal action against them[7]. The special resolution is formed under the Corporation Act where the company can change their name, types, style or add any other extra clauses which has been related to the company. A special resolution must make specific criteria before it can be passed or voted by the members of the board of the company under the special resolution. It must make a notice where the members will meet and they will vote on the special resolution regarding the clause which has been changing or adding therefore the date time and proxy information must added. It is important at least 75% of votes must cast in favor of the special resolution clause where the company or the board members will give the votes and other shareholders and members are also join in the vote process. The section 9 of the Corporation Act has defined the special resolution for the corporation where 75% of vote mast cast by the shareholders and other members of the company[8]. For a special resolution there must be a special facts i ncluded whether amending or changing the constitution or adopting a new company name of changing the company type or selective share buyback of any changes regarding the share capital of the shareholders right. Now according to the case study David and Alana has already call for an Annual General Meeting where they pass the special resolution for the alteration of CCPs Institutions and they have inserted and new clause giving the board the right to expropriate the shade Holdings of members who owned less than 10% of the total shares issued[9]. Now according to the case fact and the requirement of special resolution the directors of the company has changed in share capital or of the shareholders right regarding the shares of who owned 10% of shares of the company and they are expropriate from their rights[10]. The section 249L(c)[11] of Corporation Act provide such legislation where the special resolution must set out the intention to propose the special resolution and state the actual words of the resolution therefore when and a Annual General Meeting has been held for Casting the votes in favor of the special resolution it is important that it must fulfill the requirement of section 249L(c). The passing of a special resolution must be lodged by ASIC on form 205 notification of resolution or form 2205 notification of resolutions regarding shares. According to the case facts the directors has passed the special resolution in General Meeting where the shareholders also cast their votes which allow the directors to expropriat e shares of Max even though The Other shareholders have passed a special resolution[12]. According to the case facts the issue has been arises when Banjo who is one of the non executive directors of Aussie Boats Ltd (AB) has disagreed with the resolution and issue of shares which he thinks it will be better to enter into discussion with MWB before the terms of the takeover also things that the directors have breach there equitable or statutory duties towards the Corporation[13]. Aussie boats Limited is working great marketing strategies from past 25 years but recently the other new luxury yachts companies has made more hi-tech fit-outs boats which make difficult competition for Aussie boats Limited in the international markets and they have due to lack of funds[14]. As they are failing to running their business the directors has been decided to buying up stocks from Millionaires on Water Ltd (MWB) where they owned 35% with the plan takeover bid imminent. therefore $500,000 of shares of La La Loopsy Pty Ltd return for the provision of a report on opportunities for AB to supply boats internationally and $1 million of shares to the public to be issued for the purpose of raising additional capital for expansion purposes[15]. In the meeting of the company they have immediately engages in previously planned expansionary activities so as to improve market share and it must be informed by high quality consultancy and market research[16]. When Millionaires on Water Ltd (MWB) has taken the shares it helps to reduce 18% of steaks in Aussie Boats Ltd (AB) but as Banjo one of the non executive directors of the company things that Clancy and jack are acting really out of concern for the position as Millionaires on Water Ltd (MWB) is known to terminate the position of Executive directors after completing or take over[17]. It is important for a company when they make any new resolution or changes regarding the company and the shareholders and other members of the board then the participation of every member are necessary. The Corporation Act Section 180 defines the care and diligence of the directors officers and employees where they must act with good faith which has been mentioned section 181 and section 182 has define the use of positions of the directors said they must follow some civil obligations for running the company and holding the position of directors of the company. The section 184 has provided the legislations where the directors must act with good faith must not misuse their position or any information of the company which cause any bad effect or criminal offences with the company[18]. Therefore it is important for the director that they must not reckless or intentionally dishonest towards the corporation or commit any offensive and they must not fail to exercise their powers and discharge their duties in good faith in the best interest of the corporation or any proper purposes[19]. For running a corporation at directors must not have any personal interest or benefit out of the Corporation[20]. It is must for the directors to follow all the obligations which directly or indirectly gaining an advantage or any detriment of the corporation and towards the other officers and employees of the company[21]. They must not breach their duties if they breach the duties and the section of 181, 182, 183 and 184 therefore the court will make the allegation of breach the duties which may affect them and provide penalties. The section 1317E of Corporation Act provide such penalties for the directors who breach their duties and failed to work as care and diligence good faith use of position use of information or intention to make any criminal offences[22]. According to the case facts one of the non executive directors disagreed with the new resolution of issue of shares by the directors of the company[23] if it has found that after the new company all the positions and then they terminate the executive directors then it will made disaster for the other executive directors and non executive directors also. If the directors of the company has failed to hold their positions before they make the resolution and take over the company to new company with new issue of shares then the other members Banjo the non executive director also take legal action against them for Bridge there equitable and statutory duties towards the company[24]. If Court has found that the directors has failed to maintain their position of directors in the company then they can we find with penalties and the section 1317E of the Corporation net will provide such penalties for breach the duties of the position of the directors[25]. Reference Coffee Jr, John C., Hillary Sale, and M. Todd Henderson. "Securities regulation: Cases and materials." (2015). Corporation law 2nd edition, Jason Harris publication: LexisNexis butterworths Australia 2011 Donner, Irah H. "Fiduciary Duties of Directors When Managing Intellectual Property." Nw. J. Tech. Intell. Prop. 14 (2016): 203. Hiller, Janine S. "The benefit corporation and corporate social responsibility." Journal of Business Ethics 118.2 (2013): 287-301. Knepper, William E., et al. Duty of Loyalty. Vol. 1. Liability of Corporate Officers and Directors, 2016. Langford, Rosemary Teele, Ian Ramsay, and Michelle Anne Welsh. "The origins of company directors' statutory duty of care." (2015). Lin, Chen, et al. "Directors' and officers' liability insurance and loan spreads." Journal of Financial Economics 110.1 (2013): 37-60. Loewenstein, Mark J. "Equity and Corporate Law." SMUL Rev. 68 (2015): 783. Lunn, Brad. "Strengthened director duties of care for cybersecurity oversight: Evolving expectations of existing legal doctrine." Browser Download This Paper (2014). Spamann, Holger. "Monetary Liability for Breach of the Duty of Care?." Journal of Legal Analysis 8.2 (2016): 337-373.